WEB NEWS Research
Blog Notes: (Originally published in Speculative Screen on 10/21/2011)
Recent (Indian) RTO.
Claims to be profitable and that it has prevented several terrorist events.
Claims to have partnerships with some well known companies such as IBM and Siemens.
Sounds impressive on paper, but we know now that RTO space can be a dangerous place to trade.
Looks like trailing EPS is about $0.03, so the stock appears fairly valued (but company claims to have acquisitions lined up).
Six month 2011 financial results are less than those reported 2010.
Litigation issues exist.
Attempting to raise $15 million
We may consider performing some OTGDD.
Reverse Merger Activity
On May 16, 2011 Xalted Networks became a public entity via a reverse merger
transaction.
Company Snapshot:
engaged in the provision of advanced software solutions that enable companies and public organizations, including governments and law enforcement agencies, to capture, manage and analyze structured and unstructured data
Industry Snapshot (From the company)
We believe that the key trends driving demand for our telecom security solutions are:
Increasing revenue generation. Increasing the company’s revenue stream is the single greatest challenge in the telecom industry today. The telecom industry can improve most of its operating metrics by simply increasing revenue while controlling costs. The fastest method to increasing revenue is through its service and package offering to its users. The best possible revenue solution for the industry is to revise its service offering in such a manner, so that it requires minimal changes in the network but provides increased revenue generation. Inherently implied in this trend is that the existing revenue cannot be compromised, which is to say eliminate the potential for fraudulent use of the service providers network. To address this trend, Xalted has developed the two modules revenue maximization and revenue assurance.
Increased focus on productivity, operational performance and profitability. In today’s economy, companies are increasingly focused on improving productivity and increasing profitability by creating better-quality customer experiences and through achieving higher efficiencies across the enterprise. These objectives require organizations to better manage their customer, partner and employee relationships, analyze critical customer data, maximize the value of customer interactions and execute customer-focused business processes. Considering the high cost of acquiring new customers and the maturation of many industries, it is increasingly important to maximize revenue from the retention and continued satisfaction of current customers. Similarly, due to the high cost of upgrading the telecom network with new equipment and technologies is very expensive. Accordingly, the telecom industry would prefer to minimize capital costs while improving the overall performance of its network. The solution is have a system that can integrate new technologies and capabilities on top of the existing equipment and network capabilities or at a minimum replace the least amount of equipment possible for a new capability. To address the industry’s needs Xalted has developed its OSS/BSS software module. Within the OSS portion of the module exists tools that will allow the user to assess the networks capabilities in modifying legacy systems and equipment.
Heightened regulatory and compliance requirements and the need for dispute resolution. Compliance and regulatory pressures have increased for corporations and public organizations worldwide. These include both internal and external regulations, such as compliance and regulations that may be driven by accounting scandals (e.g., the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), security concerns (e.g., anti-money laundering legislation) and recent events in the financial industry (e.g., the increase in fraud attempts related to wire transfers). In addition, it is important to be able to eliminate and/or resolve communication disputes, such as between counterparties in a securities trade, in an efficient and definitive manner. Existing business intelligence and other IT solutions have addressed these growing challenges to some degree. However, institutions require improved solutions that not only provide better compliance and surveillance, but also more current, real-time information with increased operational visibility. Advanced FMS and OSS/BSS enable the reduction of the costs associated with ongoing compliance, improved customer service, while creating the required audit trail for regulatory purposes.
Post Merger Share Calculation : (adjusted for a four-for-one stock) TBD
GeoTeam® best effort calculation of total post reverse merger shares assuming full conversions: 30,000,000
Financial Snapshot: December Year End
2010 vs. 2009
Revenues:$7.9 million vs $5.3 million
Net Income: $2.0 million vs. $808 thousand
Six Months 2011 vs 2010
Revenues: $2.3 million vs. $5.5 million
Net Income: $486 thousand vs. $1.4 million
Pro Forma Valuation : using price of $1.10 and estimated new share count:
Trailing EPS: $0.04
Trailing P/E: 30
Investor Presentations
On October 18, 2011, Kranem Corporation (the “Company”) made a presentation at the Cyber Security Finance Forum 2011 held at the British Embassy in Washington, DC.
Liquidity Requirements
We anticipate that our cash on hand and cash flow from operations will meet our present ongoing cash needs. The Company may require additional cash resources, including loans, to meet its working capital needs for the next 12 months; should the Company decide to pursue a potential acquisition.
Per a recent investor presentation the company is attempting to raise $15 million.
Investor Alert
Restatement:
The Company has corrected its accounting for the Share Exchange Agreement with Xalted Networks, Inc, from an acquisition method of accounting to reverse recapitalization basis of accounting, see Note 3 for additional discussions. The Financial Statements for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 have the following restatements;
Extract from the Financial Statements and Restatement
1.
Extract from Statement of Operations
Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
30-Jun-11
Error
30-Jun-11
30-Jun-10
Error
30-Jun-10
US $
Correction
US $
US $
Correction
US $
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(Previously
(Unaudited)
(Previously
(Unaudited)
Stated)
(Restated)
Stated)
(Restated)
REVENUES
Income from Operations
526,664
486,377
1,013,041
1,606,145
1,606,145
COST OF REVENUES
166,749
217,714
384,463
723,936
723,936
GROSS PROFIT
329,915
298,663
628,578
882,209
882,209
OPERATING EXPENSES
Research & Development
122,364
121,945
244,309
254,011
254,011
Selling and Marketing
46,231
39,627
85,858
77,204
77,204
General and Administrative Exp.
233,023
99,525
332,548
6,304
142,223
148,527
Total Operating Expenses
391,818
270,895
662,713
6,304
473,438
479,742
OPERATING INCOME/(LOSS)
(31,703
)
(2,434
)
(34,137
)
(6,304
)
408,771
402,467
Finance Costs
(1,430
)
119,361
117,931
(200
)
(200
)
Non Operating Income
147,913
(33,080
)
114,833
41,500
41,500
Income before Income Taxes
114,780
83,847
198,627
(6,304
)
450,071
443,767
Tax Expenses
46,097
92,040
138,137
79,311
79,311
Net Income
68,093
(7,603
)
60,490
(6,304
)
370,760
364,456
Earnings per Equity share
Basic
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.00
)
0.02
0.02
Diluted
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.00
)
0.02
0.02
Weighted average number of equity shares used in computing earnings per equity share
Basic
33,379,130
(5,560,064
)
27,819,066
21,335,625
n/a
21,335,625
Diluted
33,379,130
(5,560,064
)
27,819,066
21,335,625
n/a
21,335,625
8
Statement of Operations
Six Months Ended
Six Months Ended
30-Jun-11
Error
30-Jun-11
30-Jun-10
Error
30-Jun-10
US $
Correction
US $
US $
Correction
US $
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(Previously
(Unaudited)
(Previously
(Unaudited)
Stated)
(Restated)
Stated)
(Restated)
REVENUES
Income from Operations
526,664
1,778,304
2,304,968
5,508.573
5,508.573
COST OF REVENUES
166,749
531,365
698,114
3,095,212
3,095,212
GROSS PROFIT
329,915
1,276,939
1,606,854
2,413,361
2,413,361
OPERATING EXPENSES
Research & Development
122,364
387,027
509,391
541,608
541,608
Selling and Marketing
46,231
108,475
154,706
177,093
177,093
General and Administrative Exp.
223,023
231,073
454,096
7,304
246,995
254,299
Total Operating Expenses
391,618
726,575
1,118,193
7,304
965,696
973,000
OPERATING INCOME/(LOSS)
(31,703
)
520,364
488,661
(7,304
)
1,447,665
1,440,361
Finance Costs
(1,430
)
(44,308
)
(45,738
)
(200
)
(200
)
Non Operating Income
147,913
37,188
185,101
209,092
209,092
Income before Income Taxes
110,750
517,274
628,024
(7,304
)
1,656,557
1,649,253
Tax Expenses
46,087
95,828
141.915
210,262
210,262
Net Income
64,663
421,446
486,109
(7,304
)
1,446,295
1,438,991
Earnings per Equity share
Basic
0.00
0.02
0.02
(0.00
)
0.07
0.07
Diluted
0.00
0.02
0.02
(0.00
)
0.07
0.07
Weighted average number of equity shares used in computing earnings per equity share
Basic
33,379,130
(8,783,875
)
24,595,255
21,335,625
n/a
21,335,625
Diluted
33,379,130
(8,783,875
)
24,595,255
21,335,625
n/a
21,335,625
Investor Alert
(a) The Company has an ongoing dispute with one of its Customers in Africa due to the SOW (Statement of Work) changing at regular intervals and new requirements being added regularly against what has been agreed as per Contract by the Customer. The Company had received a Notice from the Customer about the cancellation of the Contract nine (9) months back and has not heard from the Customer thereafter. In view of the uncertainty in realization of the amount of $ 216,284 due from this Customer, the Company as a prudent and conservative measure had made a Provision in the books for the entire amount of $ 216,284.
(b) Arasor Corporation. In April 2010, a petition was filed against Xalted Information in the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore by Arasor Corporation, a Delaware company. The High Court is the principal civil court of original jurisdiction in the Indian state of Karnataka, sitting in the city of Bangalore. The petition sought an order under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act of 1956 for the winding up of Xalted Information, based on allegations that Xalted Information did not pay for communications equipment sold and shipped to Arasor. We maintain the Company never received the equipment which is alleged to have been shipped to us. This type of claim, and the type of relief sought, is not unusual in India. The petition was heard by a single judge, sometimes also called a “single bench judge,” in the High Court in Karnataka. Any judicial panel comprised of fewer than all the judges in a given court is referred to in India as a “Division Bench.” The single-judge court found in favor of Arasor and against Xalted Information on November 10, 2010. On December 14, 2010, Xalted Information filed an appeal of that decision before a two- judge panel, or “Bench, of the same High Court. On January 19, 2011, the two-judge panel stayed the November 10, 2010 order of the single judge and all further proceedings in the action filed by Arasor, pending the appeal. After submission of written arguments, a hearing on the appeal was conducted in March 2011, a further hearing was set for June 9, 2011, and the earlier stay was continued during the pendency of the appeal. In June 2011, Xalted Information filed an additional application with the two-judge panel to request dismissal of the claims against it on the basis that Arasor’s corporate status was “void” in Delaware and “forfeited” in California, and that Arasor therefore was without corporate power and authority to maintain or prosecute the action. The matter is expected to be heard during August/September, 2011. The Company's lawyers have informed the Company that they believe the Company has a reasonably strong legal position and a good chance of success in the present proceedings before the appellate court. However, if we are unsuccessful in defending ourselves against the claim, Xalted Information could be subject to judicial liquidation in India