On July 16, 2010 we issued an alert that CHGY released its 2010 second quarter 10Q.
Points to ponder:
"As of May 31, 2010 we had a working capital deficit of approximately $18,704,013. Please note that although shareholder loans are payable on demand and therefore classified as short-term loans, we may not need to pay back the loan within one year. We do not expect the shareholders to demand payment on such loans this year. We anticipate that the combination of our sales and collection of accounts receivables, customer deposits and proceeds from bank and shareholder loans will generate sufficient cash flow to sustain our working capital needs."
"Term deposit represents amounts legally held by a bank which are not available for the Company’s general use. These deposits are held as collateral for issuance of notes to vendors for purchase of coal which generally mature between three to six months."
"We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item."
Our intent over the short-term is to build a check list to assess the risk position of firms in the ChinaHybrid space. For the time being this will consist of the following: (this list is likely to grow substantially)
GeoTeam® Note:
Please note: On July 6, 2010, the GeoTeam® removed all Chinese stocks that were on GeoBargains and GeoSpecial lists to respective Radar lists as we complete our "quality assessment."Short term and risk adverse investors should be aware of the quality issues currently present in the ChinaHybrid Space, questioning the validity of what seem like solid fundamental stories. It is beginning to get ugly so be cautious and understand that more pain may have to be endured, as ChinaHybrids are easy prey for short investors. The broad brush that is being applied to theses stocks appears unfair, but we can’t ignore the psychological impact this can have on investors' portfolio decisions. If history is our guide, fear will eventually create an immense opportunity to invest in the companies that prove they can meet quality litmus tests enact shareholder friendly moves. Credibility can also be restored if independent legal/SEC opinions validate accounting practices currently in question.
***Very Important GeoTeam® note. We have yet to verify if the Chinese filings for ChinaHybrid stocks we monitor match respective SEC filings. We are in the process of completing this task. Although we are not totally convinced that SAIC filings are an accurate represenation of financial statements the issue is impacting stock prices. Conservative investors may want to limit exposure or buy put options on stocks, that have this availability, as insurance against long positions, until we publish our findings. Odds are we will identify some promising companies that will fail this litmus test.
see relevant articles
China Energy Corporation has performed nicely since our alert on March 2, 2010 @ $1.20, giving us a nice boost to our portfolios. (We have now taken some shares off the table).
We have performed further due diligence to understand CHGY prospects for 2010 and beyond. China Energy's coal business derives revenues fromfour avenues: direct mining, proprietary coal trading activities, transportation coal trading activities and power generation.
China Energy's Revenue Streams
Direct Mining. As many readers may already realize, CHGY owns one mine located in Inner Mongolia. 60 to 70% of direct mining revenues occur in Inner Mongolia. Part of the success of a coal mine depends on the efficiency of what the GeoTeam calls the coal value chain
Over time the total reserve will be depleted. In the case of CHGY, after going through the value chain, management has determined that it currently has 11 million metric tons of recoverable reserves and an annual production capacity of 800 thousand tons of coal (over a 10 year life span before coal mine is depleted). Recent infrastructure improvement efforts rest efforts have dramatically increased CHGY's recovery rate. This helped CHGY report a surprisingly strong 2009 fourth quarter and should also benefit 2010 results.
Proprietary Coal Trading Activities. China Energy must meet increased demand from its customers outside Inner Mongolia. Since a good chunk of its direct mining operations serve Inner Mongolia China Energy has to purchase from a third party coal operators to meet the demand of customers outside Inner Mongolia.
Transportation Coal Trading Activities. Management indicated to us that China's coal markets can be broadly categorized into supply regions in the south and northwest and consuming regions in the east as well as the southeastern coast. Keep in mind that the supply region still does consume some coal.
Coal is transported by train, ultimately arriving at ports where it is then shipped to eastern/southern coastal regions. The challenge for coal producing/brokerage firms is that China places annual quotas on the amount of coal that companies can transport to consuming regions, leaving them with an excess supply. Consequently, this creates opportunities for firms like China Energy that have high quota limits, such as CHGY. The company transports the coal for the quota deficient client and upon arrival to its destination sells it back to the client with a mark up to cover transportation costs an a small profit
Given the three revenue streams above, China Energy, in a nutshell, can satisfy broad demand coverage; direct mining and proprietary Coal trading activities exist to meet local demand from customers; transportation coal trading operations gives CHGY exposure to regions it would not normally supply. In the case of direct mining operations the end users generally provide their own means of transportation, thus alleviating logistics costs for CHGY. At about 66%, the Gross margins on the direct mining operations are much higher than the trading operations which stand at about 7%.
"This year we expect to see margin improvement on trading since we will do more proprietary trading compared to quote trading."
Power Generation. China Energy also operates a thermoelectric power plant through its Heat Power division (utility) currently serving two purposes:
In terms of contribution to the company's bottom line, its utility operations are at nearly break even while the coal group currently accounts for all of CHGY's net income.
Due to issues associated with limited coal production capacity and the lack of profitability from its electric utility business, it may be difficult for investors to determine CHGY's potential for EPS growth.
Putting growth aside, we have a company with...
Validating China Energy's Growth
Can China Energy develop a plan to convince investors that it can aggressively grow its business beyond its current structure? Management indicated to us that there are at least three ways the company can pursue long-term growth.
Coal Business Demand Driven Growth. As the economies of Inner Mongolia and China expand so too should the need for the coal.
"The demand/supply imbalances should be intact for years to come."
With its current mining production capacity fixed at 800k tons, CHGY would have to utilize its coal trading operations to benefit from increased coal demand and/or experience an increase in coal prices. Business could also be enhanced from favorable increases in quotas limits. However, the challenge from this scenario is that the trading business carries low gross margins which would require extreme increases in revenue to drive EPS growth.
Coal Mine Acquisition. The obvious second opportunity would be to acquire another coal mine to add to its direct mining business. This strategy would carry the best margins. We estimate this tact would require from $50 to $60 million in funding. Not including the capex for mining equipment after the acquisition, funding requirements may be less.
In light of this potential need, dilution becomes the issue. Management is very aware of this and would like to minimize the likelihood of such an event. With regards to dilution, we would assume that acquiring a revenue generating mining operation could be immediately accretive to EPS, unless the coal mine does not have mining equipment installed, in which case it would take about 1.5 years or longer to have full production. Still, we suggested that the company consider ways to reduce it shares outstanding before taking on more capital and possibly waiting until the end of the year to make such a move, at which time the stock may be trading at higher levels. In doing this, CHGY could end 2010 on a positive note while entering 2011 with a new source of growth and a loaded gun.
Keep in mind that increasing coal trading activities and acquiring another mine are not mutually exclusive events. Elevated coal trading revenues are inevitable. Acquiring a mine could ultimately shift some proprietary trading revenues to direct mining operations and result in improved margins.
On an interesting side note, the government has the authority to assign coal mines to entities. If CHGY was the beneficiary of such an act, acquisition costs would be substantially reduced.
Heat transfer. As real estate expands so should the coverage area that CHGY serves. We will surmise that this segment can grow by another 20 to 30% in 2010. The good news for this division is that it seems to be close to contributing to the bottom line. However, we need to gain a better understanding of the cost equation of this business. We assume that the need for the construction of heat transfer plants and piping infrastructure will increase as area coverage expands.
To sum it up, CHGY must find a way to generate consistent EPS growth. Couple this with an enviable monopolistic like market position and investors may be inclined to assign its stock a premium multiple. It may be too early in the game to make a definitive conclusion, but the story is certainly worth following.
Concluding Thoughts:
Like many Chinese firms, CHGY likely loses two weeks worth of revenue during the March quarter. We estimate that CHGY will produce about 167 thousand tons of coal from its direct mining operations during its first quarter (vs. 300 thousand tons in the 2009 fourth quarter) and will produce about 211 thousand tons per quarter for the remainder of 2010 ($32 annually). Our coal trading revenue assumptions have a wide range (from $57 million to $92 million).
The Heat transfer business is seasonal, from October to April. This means that the revenues from the heat transfer group will be strongest in the first quarter and see no revenue in the third quarter. Overall, in 2009 the utility business grew 38.6% to $9.7 million. This growth rate is skewed somewhat as the power plant was shut down for the 2008 Olympics. We will assume a more modest growth rate of 25% for the heating transfer business for 2010 and estimate revenue of close to $12 million with no growth from the electric supply business. But in the end, since the heat power operation does not contribute to profits in will not play a big role in driving EPS.
For a rudimentary EPS forecast we analyzed the cost relationships over the past three years as a predictor of future revenues.
For our first group of EPS estimates we,
For our second group of EPS estimates we,
Full Year 2010
3year Historical average cost assumption
2yr Historical average cost from 2007and 2008
Highest cost year of last three years
GAAP Revenue avg.
$135.5 million
$110.2 million
$99.5
GAAP EPS group 1
$0.31
$0.26
0.23
GAAP EPS group 2
$0.41
$0.39
$0.38
Adjusting the 2009 fourth quarter for a more normalized coal production would have resulted in EPS of $0.10 vs. $0.11 (minus government subsidies). Annualizing this number, assuming no growth in its business, gives us a full year estimate of $0.40. Of all these scenarios we feel that the 99.5 revenue figure is most plausible with EPS falling in a range of $0.23 to $0.40. If investors choose to apply a P/E multiple of 15 to 25 they would arrive at potential valuation scenario range of $5.70 to $9.50, We will code CHGY as a GeoSpecial on the Radar as we await the first quarter release.
Potential Upside scenarios:
We were just about to publish this article yesterday afternoon when we noticed that China Energy reported its 2010 first quarter. The company came in with fantastic numbers in its seasonally weakest quarter, giving us some confidence that 2010 EPS may approach the high end of our estimated range.
Please note that:
'As of February 28, 2010 we had a working capital deficit of approximately $15,000,000. We anticipate that the combination of our sales and collection of accounts receivables, customer deposits and proceeds from bank and shareholder loans will generate sufficient cash flow to sustain our working capital needs. However we may require other sources of capital."
Other coal stocks include: Sinocoking Coal & Coke (NASDAQ:SCOK), L&L Energy (NASDAQ:LLEN),Songzai Intl Holdings (OTC BB:SGZH)
Other heat transfers stocks: Smartheat (NASDAQ:HEAT)
On March 2, 2009 we initiated a trading position in China Energy shares in the mid $1.00 area. The company reported it 2009 financial results via a 10K filing:
$0.09
There a couple of issues investor should be mindful of that could influence performance and P/E expansion:
Information we need to digest in order to gain insight into the near term growth potential of China Energy Corp:
China Energy has the rights to operate the LaiYeGou coal mine in Inner Mongolia.
China Energy Corp recently completed a two year infrastructure improvement project to its mine and now has the capacity to produce approximately up to 800,000 metric tons per year by the end of 2010.
"The expansion included the installation of “longwall” mining equipment, the construction of wider laneways for access to the mine and from mine to coal field, construction of seven work stations and emergency exits and improvements to the draught system."
2009 mining operations were temporarily hurt as these improvements were implemented. We found it interesting that the LaiYe Gou mine has established proven and probable reserves of 26.09 million metric tons.
"China Energy does not expect to encounter further interruptions in its business operations."
It appears that China Energy Corp produced 453,430k metric tons of coal in 2009 of which about 300k metric tons were produced in the fourth quarter. (still need confirmation on this, as this seems large). What we need to know is how fast operations will reach full capacity.
We will provide more details if warranted. Any input is appreciated.
Maj
Disclosure: Long
2009 10K Excerpts:
Energy - NonRenewableCoal
ceccec.com