Benda Pharmaceuticals (PINK:BPMA)

On November 10, 2005, there was a small explosion in the Yidu plant resulting in the deaths of two of our workers. This tragic accident resulted from the violation of our operating procedures by one of the workers killed in the explosion. We paid RMB 260,000 (or $32,500) to each of the victims’ families in settlement of any compensation issues. On November 11, 2005, there was another explosion in the same factory resulting from a chemical reaction triggered by the prior explosion. Fortunately management had anticipated this incident and the plant had already been temporarily sealed so that no further injury occurred.

As previously disclosed, on December 30, 2009, Benda Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) was served with a Summons and Complaint filed by Pope Investments, LLC (“Pope”) in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) against the Company and our officers and directors. Pope filed the Summons and Complaint as a judgment creditor and as a shareholder of the Company. Pope alleges that the assets and profits of our subsidiary company have been wrongfully diverted by our officers and directors and requests the appointment of a receiver to liquidate and wind down the business affairs of the Company. In connection with the filing of the Summons and Complaint, Pope has also filed a motion for a Preliminary Injunction Motion seeking to enjoin the Company and our officers and directors from taking any further actions to divert the corporate assets and profits of our subsidiary company and for expedited discovery proceedings. Pope further requests the imposition of a constructive trust, an accounting, damages for an alleged breach of fiduciary duty by the Company’s officers and directors, and attorneys’ fees. An expedited hearing on Pope’s application seeking the appointment of a receiver (the “Application”) was held on March 29, 2010. The parties filed post-trial briefs on April 7, 2010.

On December 15, 2010, the Court, in a written decision, denied Pope’s expedited application pursuant to Count I of its Compliant seeking the appointment of a receiver to assume management of Benda’s affairs. The Motion to Dismiss Pope’s Complaint against the Benda directors and officers named as defendants remains pending

The Company has become aware that Excalibur Limited Partnership and Excalibur Limited Partnership II (the "Plaintiffs") filed a motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint pursuant to CPLR § 3213 (the "Motion") with the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the "Court"), alleging that the Company has been delinquent on the payment of an aggregate sum of $600,000 and accrued interest and costs arising from the Convertible Promissory Notes that were issued to the Plaintiffs in April 2007 in connection with a $7,560,000 private placement. Pursuant to the motion, the Plaintiffs requested that the Court (1) enter summary judgment in favor of Excalibur Limited Partnership (“Excalibur Limited”) in the amount of $390,000 plus all accrued interest and costs, and, (2) enter summary judgment in favor of Excalibur Small Cap Opportunities LP (“Excalibur Small Cap”) in the amount of $210,000 and accrued interest and costs. On July 29, 2009, the Court entered a judgment against the Company in favor of the Plaintiffs in the amount of $674,251.65 in connection with the Convertible Promissory Notes issued to the Plaintiffs in April 2007 in a private placement.

On November 27, 2007, Shenzhen Arbitration Commission determined that:

1. Benda Ebei should pay for the consideration of Rmb 6.24 million, equal to 50% of the total consideration set forth in the Equity Transfer Agreement. For the other 50% of the total consideration which was supposed to be settled in the form of issuing common stock, since Zhang did not make an arbitration request on how to execute the arrangement, the Arbitration Commission did not make an award on this particular part.

2. Benda Ebei should pay for the penalty of Rmb 46,800;

3. Benda Eebi should pay for legal and arbitration expenses of Rmb 268,971.

On May 22, 2008, Benda Ebei applied to Shenzhen People Court to terminate above mentioned arbitration. The termination is based on the ground that Xiaozhi Zhang does not own all 6.24% of SiBiono’s common stock. In fact, he only owns 3.28% of SiBiono’s stock. The application has been accepted by Shenzhen People Court and is waiting for its further investigation..